Skip to content
Yendo más allá: Proxy Voting

Glass Lewis Announces Updated Approach to Diversity-Related Proxy Voting

ByShirley Westcott

On March 4, proxy advisor Glass Lewis announced that was implementing a new bifurcated approach to its proxy voting advice on diversity-related voting matters at U.S. public companies. It had advised clients on Feb. 18 that it was reevaluating its policies in view of the Trump administration’s January executive orders banning illegal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the federal government and the Attorney General’s directive to the Department of Justice to investigate, eliminate and penalize private companies that have illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI.

Glass Lewis will continue to apply its 2025 U.S. benchmark and thematic guidelines on board elections and DEI-related shareholder proposals as is.¹ However, beginning March 10, where it recommends against directors for any diversity-related reasons, its proxy papers will carry a “For You Attention” (FYA) flag pointing clients to a supporting rationale that they can leverage if their preference is to vote differently from Glass Lewis’s recommendation.

Glass Lewis’s U.S. benchmark policy on board diversity is as follows:

  • For Russell 3000 firms, it generally recommends against the nominating committee chair if the board is not at least 30% gender diverse and against the full nominating committee if there are no gender diverse directors.
  • For non-Russell 3000 firms, it generally recommends against the nominating committee chair if there are no gender diverse directors.
  • For Russell 1000 companies, it generally recommends against the nominating committee chair if the board has no directors from an underrepresented community. It will additionally oppose the nominating/ governance committee chair if there is no disclosure of individual or aggregate racial/ethnic minority board demographic information.

Glass Lewis believes its updated approach will allow it to support the varied diversity-related voting preferences of its institutional clients without the disruption that a hard policy change would pose in the middle of proxy season. The announcement follows Services’ (ISS) decision to suspend its consideration of gender and racial/ethnic diversity factors in its voting recommendations on director elections beginning with its reports issued on or after Feb. 25.

If you would like to receive our regular blog featuring reports, news and reviews in future, please enter your details in the form below.

Please enter your details to subscribe

Article by

  • Headshot of Shirley Westcott, Senior Vice President
    Senior Vice President

    Shirley is Senior Vice President in the Proxy Solicitation Group at Alliance Advisors since 2011 where she advises public companies on their corporate governance practices and issues of concern to shareholders.

    View all posts
Autor del artículo
Más artículos

2026 US Proxy Season – Rule 14a 8 in Practice, Texas in Ascendance

Summary The 2026 US proxy season closed with relatively smooth outcomes for public companies despite two major stressors: the SEC’s…

2026 U.S. Proxy Season Preview

As the 2026 annual meeting season unfolds, companies and investors are navigating a proxy environment marked by regulatory disruption, lower…

State Street Issues 2026 Policy Updates

State Street Investment Management (SSIM)–formerly State Street Global Advisors (SSGA)–has published its 2026 global voting policy updates which are effective…

UK Investment Trusts: Governance, Activism, and Strategic Communication

Introduction 2025 marked a decisive shift in the UK investment trust landscape. What began as a prolonged period of wide…

Con la serie de investigaciones » Going Beyond» de Alliance Advisors, ponemos de relieve debates y contenidos clave que están dando forma al mundo del gobierno corporativo, la remuneración de los ejecutivos, los criterios ESG, el activismo accionarial, la captación de clientes minoristas y las fusiones y adquisiciones.