Skip to content
한 걸음 더 나아가기: Industry Fund Profile

Industry Fund Profile – Energy Minerals

ByAlliance Advisors

Through the first quarter of 2025, the S&P Composite 1500 / Energy Index has reached heights only achieved twice (in 2008 and 2014), leading investors to believe that valuations of the Energy sector have pushed into over-valued territory. The S&P Energy Select Sector Index has similarly reached heights only broached twice before and so far this year, energy stocks lead all S&P 500 sectors. Understanding what has underpinned this performance helps explain the drivers of smart-money sentiment. While prices were relatively flat for all but one of the key energy products in 2025’s first quarter, only natural gas prices that have risen, rallying nearly 25%.¹ Since hitting $80 a barrel on January 15, West Texas Intermediate crude oil has fallen by nearly 30%, hitting sub $57 just recently. This scenario played nicely into the broader market sentiment that saw many factors create a “risk-off” environment, prompting a rotation out of growth-oriented sectors into more defensive and/or value-focused areas.

With this backdrop in mind, Alliance Advisors conducted shareholder analysis to see which investors were buttressing the sector’s performance. We reviewed mutual fund holdings within our innovative investor intelligence platform, Invictus®, to understand which mutual funds were the most bullish supporters of the Energy Minerals sector, and the results proved interesting. Our initial screen was for actively managed mutual funds based in the United States that have been increasing their exposure to Energy Minerals sector stocks by more than $5 million. We then filtered out any funds that did not hold at least five (5) Energy Minerals sector stocks so as to remove any anomalous outliers. When sorting this list by the percentage of purchased to owned investments, a clear trend emerged. The most bullish funds in the Energy Minerals sector were not industry funds (Oil, Gas, Commodities, etc), but rather Value focused funds followed by Global funds. Leading the list was the Allspring Large Company Value Fund managed by Ryan Brown and Harin de Silva. Underpinning the fund’s sector investment theme was a rotation into mega cap names (ConocoPhillips, EOG Resources, and Exxon Mobil) at the expense of mid- and large-cap names (Ovintiv, National Fuel Gas, and Diamondback Energy).

Firm NameFocusOwned $MMAverage Owned $MMOwned $MM ChangeOwned MM Chg vs OwnedOwned % Portfolio
Allspring Large Company Value FundValue$15,751,791 $3,937,948 $9,317,191 144.8%6.8%
Avantis US Large Cap Value FundValue$40,797,877 $2,209,713 $13,413,305 49.0%9.9%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value FundValue$852,150,066 $207,129,403 $193,608,892 29.4%10.3%
BlackRock Advantage International FundGlobal$116,145,038 $18,658,641 $25,206,807 27.7%2.9%
Kopernik Global All Cap FundGlobal$135,209,516 $25,031,000 $26,353,025 24.2%7.7%
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure & Income FundIncome$135,914,501 $16,146,456 $25,714,534 23.3%29.6%
VT III Vantagepoint International FundGlobal$36,261,491 $4,530,062 $6,204,349 20.6%2.5%
American Funds International Growth & Income FundGr. & Inc. $611,532,032 $143,971,314 $92,053,634 17.7%4.1%
T. Rowe Price Funds SICAV - US Large Cap Value Equity FundValue$64,699,823 $13,621,709 $9,676,773 17.6%7.8%
Principal Funds, Inc. - MidCap Value Fund IValue$84,621,157 $6,994,692 $9,582,887 12.8%3.6%

Similarly, the Avantis US Large Cap Value Fund managed by Eli Salzmann and David Levine, the second largest percentage increase in the sector, was also seen rotating into meg cap sector names (Chevron, Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips and EOG Resources) at the expense of smaller capitalization companies (HF Sinclair, PBF Energy, Civitas Resources, SM Energy, and APA Corporation). Helping Chevron during this period was the US President weighing a plan to extend Chevron’s license to pump oil in Venezuela, as per Reuters.

The Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund, the third largest increase with a dedicated value focus, seemed to apply a comparable approach by heavily increasing exposure to EOG Resources and Chevron, though instead of sourcing capital from smaller market capitalization companies chose to rotate within the mega cap space by reducing exposure to Exxon Mobil and Phillips 66. In the fund’s April commentary, fund manager David Levine wrote, “From a sector allocation standpoint, the Fund benefited from an overweight positioning in energy and an underweight positioning in information technology”.

In shifting to the Global funds, the most bullish fund was the BlackRock Advantage International Fund managed by Raffaele Savi, Kevin Franklin and Richard Mathieson. This fund mirrored the earlier trends of increasing exposure to mega cap names, though those outside of the United States (Shell PLC, Equinor ASA, and TotalEnergies SE), each within the Integrated Oil industry. When highlighting the contributing factors to performance, the fund’s most recently commentary stated,

Fundamental quality measures focused on sustainability of earnings and penalizing companies with high wage pressures were the top contributors… Collectively, stock selection was strong across Europe through a preference for domestic financials and defense stocks over those reliant on global trade.

Another globally-focused fund exhibiting bullish sentiment in the Energy Minerals sector was the Kopernik Global All Cap Fund managed by Alissa Corcoran and Dave Iben. This fund made a rotation into North America with its three largest purchases in Canada’s MEG Energy, US-based Expand Energy and Range Resources. This trend follows in line with the fund’s driving principle that being an opportunistic portfolio will have a low correlation to other managers. The fund’s primary philosophy and process is designed to capitalize on market dislocations based on fear and greed.

The period for which these holdings analysis encompassed was historically unique, as the overarching influence on investor sentiment was the US President’s ever-changing tariff strategy. Crude benchmarks suffered from demand concerns related to these tariff concerns. After providing initial headwinds, a decision to pause tariffs on non-retaliatory nations for 90 days and lowered reciprocal tariffs to 10% provided some tailwinds. Also, tanker data had Russian, Iranian and Venezuelan crude exports all rebounding in March, despite US sanction threats.

For corporates looking to influence their shareholder constituents, Alliance’s team of market experts can help you understand shifting market dynamics to ensure your time is spent with the “right” shareholders instead of the traditional peer-focused investors.

¹ Energy Information Administration

If you would like to receive our regular blog featuring reports, news and reviews in future, please enter your details in the form below.

Please enter your details to subscribe

기사 작성자
더 많은 기사

Pay transparency and pay equity

Financier Worldwide discusses pay transparency and pay equity with Etelvina Martinez, Michael Vogele, Reid Pearson and Peter Casey at Alliance…

Retail Engagement – Digital Tools

How Digital Tools Have Become the New Standard in Mutual Fund Proxy Solicitations Every mutual fund—or any company with a…

Investment Trend Analysis – Deep Value

Through the first quarter of 2025, investors were coming to grips with the adverse consequences of rising tariffs. The S&P…

Alliance Advisors의 ‘Going Beyond’ 연구 시리즈를 통해 기업 지배구조, 임원 보상, ESG, 주주 행동주의, 개인 투자자 대상 마케팅 및 M&A 분야를 형성하는 핵심적인 논의와 콘텐츠를 중점적으로 다룹니다.

뉴욕 • 워싱턴 D.C. • 토론토 • 밴쿠버
런던 • 더반 • 타이베이 • 홍콩 • 서울

뉴욕

800 3rd Ave 17층
뉴욕
뉴욕 10022

Get in touch

글로벌 본사

오버룩 코퍼레이트 센터
클로브 로드 150번지, 스위트 400
리틀 폴스, 뉴저지 07424

Get in touch

유럽 본부

타워 42
올드 브로드 스트리트 25번지
런던, EC2N 1HN

Get in touch

아시아 태평양 본부

23/F One Chinachem Central,
22 Des Voeux Road Central,
홍콩 센트럴

Get in touch

캐나다

400 – 22 E 5번가
밴쿠버, BC V5T 1G8

Get in touch

얼라이언스 어드바이저스(Alliance Advisors)는 글로벌 네트워크를 통해 주주총회 자문, 주주 참여, 보상, 지배구조 및 지속가능성 서비스를 전문으로 하는 독립 자문 회사입니다.

당사는 대담하고 고객 중심의 전략을 수립부터 실행에 이르기까지 한 차원 더 높은 수준으로 추진하여 성공적인 결과를 이끌어냅니다.

서비스

문의하기