Skip to content
Going Beyond: The Board Matrix

Company’s Business Card: The Board Matrix in Germany & Austria

Company’s Business Card: The Board Matrix in Germany & Austria

BySandro Barbato & Angelika Horstmeier

The Board Matrix

The institutional investors’ vote, when it relates to a corporate board, is typically not to appoint the Executive Board. The investor can only appoint the Supervisory Board, who then in turn appoints the Executive Board.

It is therefore imperative for all investors to consider and guide their voting choices very carefully.

But without sufficient information, it is impossible to make an informed voting decision.

Companies typically publish the candidates and their CV, which should contain a certain set of information. But for many investors and proxy advisors, this is not enough. Therefore, the demand of insightful board matrices is growing.

A good board matrix helps investors and proxy advisors to assess the board and its candidates in relation to age, gender, nationality, relevant expertise, skills and knowledge, cultural background and so on.

Imagine your board matrix as the business card of the company.

(Investor statement during a corporate governance engagement call)

But such a matrix is not exclusively useful for shareholders. It provides also benefits for the company itself. Having a structured approach and overview about the single directors per se and as a board, provides important insights about areas of improvement and necessary future changes.

Even though this paper is mostly about the (non-executive) supervisory board, its members and candidates, similar rules and expectations are rising about the management board.

Alliance Advisors has extensive experience in creating board matrices from scratch or refining existing ones. Our approach combines impactful personal director information with relevant & meaningful skills disclosure. Contact us today to learn more about optimizing your board’s composition and disclosure.

Set-Up, Best-Practice & Example

The Set-up

In a column-oriented board matrix, the upper part should include insights about the following categories:

Tenure, Biographical & Gender

  • General identity, start/end dates, duration of service and gender.

Role & Classifications

  • The director’s status within the board and committees.

Background & Experiences

  • Professional background, expertise, international experiences.

Governance & Assessment

  • Metrics to rate the director’s compliance.

The lower part is dedicated to the set of board skills, and how the single director rates against them. For this bottom part, there is no one-size-fits-all approach. Different markets and each industry requires a customized approach.

For example, a company with an M&A related growth strategy, skills and experiences in it should be represented on board level, and be represented in the board matrix, too.

Best Practice

Some additional best-practice recommendations to consider:

Connectivity with the CV

  • All information from the matrix should be reflected in the CV, being comprehensible and verifiable.

Objectivity

Many such matrices are based on self-assessments. To increase the credibility of the entire matrix, an external assessment is preferrable.

Differentiation

  • Not having a skill in every single category is not a sign of lack of awareness, but rather demonstrates a realistic self-assessment.

Degrees of Fulfilment

  • Skills should not be shown as yes/no only. There are shades between a limited and an expert level, which should be expressed in the matrix.

Example

While our own customized approach goes even beyond this detailed example from the DWS Corporate Governance and Proxy Voting Policy 2025, it shows the approach of an upper section with details about the director, and the lower section with a skills rating.

NameBoard Member 1Board Member 2Board Member 3Board Member 4Board Member 5Board Member 6
General Information
Date of BirthDD.MM.YYYDD.MM.YYYDD.MM.YYYDD.MM.YYYDD.MM.YYYDD.MM.YYY
GenderFFFFFM
NationalityGermanGerman/US-AmericanSouth AfricanSwissGermanGerman
First Elected In201420172018202120102016
CommitteesBoard Chair Nomination (C) Mediation (C)Audit (C) Sustainability InnovationAudit (C) Sustainability InnovationDeputy Board Chair Nomination Innovation (C) MediationNomination SustainabilityAudit Sustainability Innovation
IndependentYesYesYesYesNo (tenure)No (former CEO)
Competencies
Accounting
Audit
Any Special and/or Regulatory Competence
Sector Specific Competence 1
Sector Specific Competence 2
Sector Specific Competence 3
Leadership
Sustainability
Digitisation
Additional Compentence 10
Additional Compentence 11

Voting Guideline Excerpts & Additional Insights

Voting Guideline Excerpts – Proxy Advisory

Proxy Advisors Services (“ISS”) guidelines and the Glass, Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) approach differ as they issue a Continental Europe guideline which is accompanied by the German and Austrian market-dedicated specific guideline. The Continental Europe guidelines and the additional market-specific versions complement each other.

ISS: Continental Europe

  • “Adequate disclosure“ expected for director elections.

Glass Lewis: Continental Europe

Information that Glass Lewis considers particularly critical for shareholder review when evaluating a candidate for election include the following:

  • the independence of the nominee;
  • the nature of any relationships between the nominee and the company, its directors and executives, major shareholders and any other related parties;
  • the current occupation and outside directorships held by a nominee; and
  • the relevant experience and skills possessed by a nominee.

Glass Lewis: Guidelines for Germany

  • The supervisory board is recommended to prepare a profile of skills and expertise for the entire supervisory board. The profile of skills and expertise should be disclosed in the format of a qualification matrix.

Glass Lewis: Guidelines for Austria

  • Glass Lewis believes companies should disclose sufficient information to allow a meaningful assessment of a board’s skills and competencies.

IVOX (applying BVI rules)

  • The critical factors for electing and discharging the members of the executive and non-executive supervisory board or board of directors are (…) missing clear allocation of the required qualifications, as indicated in the profile of competencies of the entire supervisor board, to the individual candidates in the form of a qualification matrix.
  • The critical factors for discharge of the members of the executive/management board, the supervisory board or the board of directors are (…) lack of expertise of the supervisory board in  relation to sustainability issues and/or failure  to disclose sustainability expertise in the form of a qualification matrix.

Voting Guideline Excerpts – Institutional Investors

Allianz Global Investors

  • We expect all companies to disclose: the names, core competencies and qualifications of the candidates, diversity characteristics and skills the candidates bring to the board, as well as professional and other background (…).

Amundi

  • With regard to Directors’ profiles, we consider it essential to have detailed information on each nominee before the vote at the Meeting (curriculum vitae, skills brought to the Board of Directors that justify the choice of this candidate, current mandates).

BlackRock

  • When nominating directors to the board, we look to companies to provide sufficient information on the individual candidates.
  • These disclosures should give an understanding of how the collective experience and expertise of the board, as well as the particular skill sets of individual directors, aligns with the company’s long-term strategy and business model.

BNP Paribas Asset Management

  • Board Elections, FOR: There is sufficient biographical information for shareholders to vote on an informed basis.

Calvert

  • Support proposals requesting companies to disclose a board diversity and qualifications matrix.

Candriam

  • Mere biographical details do not suffice; as a general rule, shareholders should be provided with a detailed report of the skills and competences of Board members including a clear Board skills matrix.

Capital Group

  • We evaluate director nominees not only on an individual basis but also in the context of the whole board.
  • We believe boards, as a whole, should have appropriate industry knowledge, skills, business experience and understanding of all relevant stakeholders of the company in order to discharge their duties effectively.

Colorado PERA

  • Companies should include a skills matrix in their proxy statements. It should outline items such as the skills, experiences, background, and qualifications of individual directors, providing shareholders with a clear understanding of the board’s collective capabilities.

CPP (Canada Pension Plan)

  • Support disclosure of each director nominee’s experience, qualifications and attributes in the form of a matrix to summarize the strengths and potential gaps on the board as a whole.

Deka

  • The supervisory board must (…) prepare a profile detailing the competency of the board as a whole; a qualification matrix must be produced to explain how the details in the competency profile have been arrived at.

Dimensional

  • Dimensional believes information about a portfolio company’s assessment and refreshment process should be disclosed and should generally include: (…) The alignment between the skills and expertise of each board member and the key competencies identified in the board assessment process.

DWS

  • DWS will generally vote AGAINST if (…) There is no comprehensive disclosure on the qualifications and suitability (through, for example, a competence profile and qualifications matrix) of the board nominee.

Neuberger Berman

  • We expect companies to disclose a board skills matrix that identifies the skills, experience, and qualifications of key importance to the board and the relevant skills held by each director. We believe a skills matrix can be a helpful tool to evaluate a board’s composition of skills and experience, identify skills gaps, and support succession planning and the director nomination process.

Nomura Asset Management

  • Disclosing the skills of each director in a matrix format is not only clear but also useful for selecting successors.

Norges Bank Investment Management

  • The board should ensure that it can bring a broad range of perspectives and approaches to its decision-making process.
  • The board should have an appropriate balance of competences and backgrounds.

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan

  • We encourage and support proposals requesting the adoption and disclosure of a board skills matrix – which should highlight skills and areas of expertise that are relevant in the context of the company’s strategy and material risks to the company as a best practice tool to achieve this.

State Street Global Advisors

  • We also believe the right mix of skills, independence, diversity, and qualifications among directors provides boards with the knowledge and experience to manage risks and operating structures that are often complex and industry-specific.

Union Investment

  • General requirements (…) A competence matrix with clear allocation of the individual members should illustrate the coverage of relevant competencies.
  • The qualifications and key details of Supervisory Board and Management Board members should be published permanently.

Vanguard: Proxy voting policy for U.K. and Europe

  • Disclosure should include the range of skills, background, and experience that each board member provides and their alignment with the company’s strategy (typically presented as a skills matrix).

Additional Insights

Glass Lewis: Board Skills Appendix Document

  • Traditionally, directors’ biographies have read like an abridged C.V.; comprising a list of past appointments, with an emphasis on board-level experience both past & present.
  • Having an appropriate mix of certain attributes on the board — in particular skills, experience, diversity, and independence — is essential to ensure that the board as a whole can satisfactorily perform its oversight duty, have informed opinions on all topics relevant to the company and effectively advise management on important strategic decisions.

Glass Lewis: Disclosure of Board Skills & Experience – Emerging Best Practice Document

  • By highlighting the key skills and experience of new nominees to the board in the context of the overall board profile, shareholders will be able to better understand why these individuals were chosen by the board for nomination.

Austrian Corporate Governance Code

  • Before the election, the persons proposed for the supervisory board must disclose to the general meeting their professional qualifications, their professional or comparable functions, and any circumstances that could give rise to concerns about bias.

German Corporate Governance Code

  • The Supervisory Board shall determine specific objectives regarding its composition, and shall prepare a profile of skills and expertise for the entire Board while taking the principle of diversity into account
  • The implementation status shall be disclosed in the form of a qualification matrix in the Corporate Governance Statement.

DVFA Position Paper: Qualification matrix for supervisory boards and management boards, September 2025

  • The majority of competencies are regularly stated as being possessed by almost all supervisory board members.
  • In most cases, a self-assessment by the supervisory board members concerned is sufficient to fill in the matrix, and there is a lack of comprehensible, objective criteria that contribute to credibility.
  • The CVs of the respective members often do not adequately reflect the competencies stated.

Our Experts

Article by

With Alliance Advisors Going Beyond research series, we bring to the forefront pivotal discussions and content that are shaping the world of Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, ESG, Shareholder Activism, Retail Outreach and M&A.

New York Washington DC • Toronto London
Durban  Taipei Hong Kong Seoul

Alliance Advisors는 글로벌 네트워크를 통해 주주 회의 자문, 주주 참여, 보상, 거버넌스 및 지속 가능성 서비스에 중점을 둔 독립 자문 회사입니다.

우리는 개발에서 대담한 고객 우선 전략의 실행에 이르기까지 그 이상을 추구하여 성공적인 결과를 가져옵니다.

우리의 서비스